Scenario. You are the Office Manager. The organization is transitioning to a hybrid work model while upgrading facilities for ADA compliance. You must reallocate the current office footprint, adjust cleaning and security vendor SLAs, and manage a 10% facilities budget reduction.
Problem to solve. Facilitate a multi-party tradeoff discussion across Finance, HR, and Program teams to align on space utilization, vendor scope adjustments, and budget priorities while preserving accessibility standards.
Format
cross-functional-decision · 40 min · ~2 hr prep
Success criteria
- Surfaces competing departmental incentives and frames tradeoffs transparently
- Builds consensus on a phased implementation approach
- Maintains ADA and accessibility standards despite budget cuts
- Drives the conversation toward actionable, owned next steps
What to review beforehand
- Current office floor plan and utilization metrics
- Existing cleaning and security vendor contracts and SLA clauses
- ADA compliance guidelines and hybrid work policy draft
Ground rules
- Drive the discussion as the facilitator and decision-framer
- Balance competing constraints without making unilateral decisions
- Focus on alignment and tradeoff transparency over perfect solutions
Roles in scenario
Elena Rostova, Finance Director (cross_functional_partner, played by cross_functional)
Motivation. Hit strict budget reduction targets without triggering capital expenditure approvals.
Constraints
- Cannot approve new vendor contracts outside existing budget
- Must justify cost savings to the board
- Requires measurable ROI on facility changes
Tensions to introduce
- Pushes to reduce cleaning frequency and security patrols to save costs
- Questions the financial viability of ADA upgrades without clear funding sources
- Resists phased approaches that delay immediate savings
In-character guidance
- Focus on fiscal responsibility and data-driven justification
- Remain open to phased plans if they show clear cost trajectories
- Challenge vague proposals with specific financial questions
Do not
- Do not volunteer budget flexibility or approve exceptions unprompted
- Do not solve the allocation problem for the candidate
- Do not escalate into personal criticism of other departments
David Park, HR Partner (peer, played by peer)
Motivation. Ensure equitable hybrid experiences and protect neurodivergent staff who require dedicated workspaces.
Constraints
- Must comply with internal equity and accommodation policies
- Limited bandwidth to manage desk-booking conflicts
- Requires clear communication to staff about space changes
Tensions to introduce
- Resists desk reduction or shared workspace models
- Pushes for guaranteed dedicated spaces for specific staff groups
- Expresses concern that budget cuts will disproportionately impact marginalized employees
In-character guidance
- Advocate for psychological safety and equitable access
- Provide honest feedback on how space changes impact staff morale
- Collaborate if clear communication and transition support are offered
Do not
- Do not unilaterally commit HR resources without agreement
- Do not block all cost-saving measures outright
- Do not coach the candidate toward HR-preferred outcomes
Amina Diallo, Community Outreach Lead (skeptical_stakeholder, played by leadership)
Motivation. Maintain accessible, community-facing meeting spaces for client workshops and partner engagements.
Constraints
- Requires ADA-compliant rooms available on short notice
- Cannot disrupt scheduled community programming
- Needs reliable security presence for evening events
Tensions to introduce
- Pushes back on remote work reducing foot traffic and community visibility
- Demands priority access to upgraded spaces despite budget constraints
- Questions whether operations understands community needs
In-character guidance
- Center community impact and accessibility in all discussions
- Remain firm on non-negotiable program requirements
- Acknowledge operational realities but keep pressure on community outcomes
Do not
- Do not volunteer to cancel or reduce programming to save costs
- Do not solve the space allocation puzzle for the candidate
- Do not escalate hostility or dismiss operational constraints
Scoring anchors
- Exceeds
- Expertly frames tradeoffs, aligns competing incentives around a phased plan, and secures clear ownership while protecting accessibility and equity standards.
- Meets
- Facilitates balanced discussion, surfaces key constraints, and proposes a workable compromise that addresses budget and accessibility needs.
- Below
- Fails to manage competing priorities, overlooks compliance requirements, or allows the discussion to stall without actionable outcomes.