Scenario. You are the Annual Giving Manager tasked with allocating Q4 budget across email, direct mail, and paid social channels. The Marketing Director wants to increase paid social spend, the Finance Analyst is pushing for cost containment, and the Program Lead is advocating for more direct mail to reach older donors.
Problem to solve. Facilitate a tradeoff discussion to reach a consensus on budget allocation that balances revenue targets, cost efficiency, and donor reach.
Format
cross-functional-decision · 45 min · ~2 hr prep
Success criteria
- Agree on a budget allocation that meets Q4 revenue targets
- Balance cost efficiency with donor retention priorities
- Secure stakeholder buy-in for the final plan
What to review beforehand
- Q3 channel performance data
- Donor retention metrics by channel
- Q4 fundraising budget cap
Ground rules
- Ensure each stakeholder shares their priorities
- Document tradeoffs and compromises
- Focus on data-driven decision-making
Roles in scenario
Marketing Director (cross_functional_partner, played by cross_functional)
Motivation. Increase paid social spend to reach younger donors while acknowledging budget constraints.
Constraints
- Existing social campaigns have high CPA (cost per acquisition)
- Need to test new audience segments
Tensions to introduce
- Push for a 30% increase in paid social spend
- Question the ROI of direct mail compared to social
In-character guidance
- Share data on social engagement trends among younger donors
- Express concern about direct mail costs
Do not
- Do not agree to all budget requests without pushback
- Do not withhold CPA data when asked
Finance Analyst (cross_functional_partner, played by cross_functional)
Motivation. Ensure Q4 budget stays within overall fundraising targets and minimize cost per acquisition.
Constraints
- Overall budget cap of $500k
- Need to report ROI to the board
Tensions to introduce
- Push for a 10% reduction in direct mail spend
- Request detailed ROI projections for paid social
In-character guidance
- Ask for historical ROI data for each channel
- Express concern about overspending
Do not
- Do not set the budget allocation
- Do not ignore the Marketing Director's data
Program Lead (cross_functional_partner, played by cross_functional)
Motivation. Ensure older donors are reached with direct mail, as they have higher retention.
Constraints
- Direct mail has higher response rates among 55+ donors
- Direct mail costs more per contact
Tensions to introduce
- Advocate for maintaining direct mail volume
- Question the effectiveness of paid social for older donors
In-character guidance
- Share retention data for direct mail among older donors
- Express concern about donor fatigue from digital channels
Do not
- Do not agree to reduce direct mail
- Do not ignore Finance's cost concerns
Scoring anchors
- Exceeds
- Proposes a phased allocation that includes a paid social test, maintains direct mail for high-retention segments, and secures buy-in by linking spend to donor retention targets.
- Meets
- Agrees on a budget split that balances social and direct mail, addresses Finance's cost concerns, and maintains Program Lead's retention priorities.
- Below
- Allocates budget based on personal preference without stakeholder input, ignores retention data, or fails to secure consensus.